论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与开腹手术的临床疗效。方法:选取2013年9月至2014年11月间该院收治的子宫肌瘤患者58例,根据手术方式的不同分为观察组(30例)和对照组(28例),观察组给予腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术,对照组实施开腹手术,记录两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、肛门首次排气时间、住院天数、术后并发症,并进行对比。结果:观察组患者的手术时间长于对照组(P<0.05),观察组的术中出血量、肛门首次排气时间、住院天数明显少于对照组(P<0.05),在术后不良反应发生情况方面观察组明显少于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术具有创伤小、恢复快、术后并发症少的优点,值得临床推广。
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic myomectomy and laparotomy. Methods: Fifty-eight patients with uterine leiomyoma admitted from September 2013 to November 2014 in our hospital were divided into observation group (30 cases) and control group (28 cases) according to different surgical methods. The observation group was given laparoscopy Uterine fibroids were removed. The control group was operated on laparotomy. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, first discharge time of anus, days of hospitalization, postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results: The operation time of the observation group was longer than that of the control group (P <0.05). The intraoperative blood loss, the time of the first defecation of the anus and the number of days of hospitalization in the observation group were significantly less than those in the control group (P <0.05) The observation group was significantly less than the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic myomectomy has the advantages of less trauma, faster recovery and fewer postoperative complications, which is worthy of clinical promotion.