论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除与开腹子宫切除的临床效果。方法本次医学研究选取2010年1月至2012年1月之间在本院就诊的100例子宫切除患者为观察对象,随机将其分为腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除组和开腹子宫切除组,对比两组患者临床治疗效果以及相关临床观察指标。结果腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除组患者术后住院时间、术后病率、术后镇痛药物使用率、术后肛门排气时间等观察指标,以及手术时间和术中出血量等手术指标均显著优于开腹子宫切除组,两组患者临床治疗效果对比具有明显的统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术具有较为满意的临床治疗效果,因而临床应用价值较高。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy and open hysterectomy. Methods The medical study selected 100 cases of hysterectomy patients treated in our hospital from January 2010 to January 2012 were randomly divided into laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy group and open hysterectomy group , Compared the clinical efficacy of two groups of patients and related clinical observation indicators. Results The laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy patients’ postoperative hospital stay, postoperative morbidity, postoperative analgesic drug use rate, postoperative anal exhaust time and other indicators, as well as operative time and intraoperative blood loss and other surgical indicators Significantly better than open abdominal hysterectomy group, the clinical efficacy of the two groups compared with significant statistical differences (P <0.05). Conclusions Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy has a satisfactory clinical treatment effect, so the clinical value is higher.