论文部分内容阅读
近几年来，刑事审判方式改革一直是司法改革的中心环节，广为人们关注。同其他司法改革一样，刑事审判方式改革的目标是双重的：通过改革实现和保障司法公正；通过改革提高司法效率。尽管这是两个并行不悖的目标，但在司法效率低下的情况下，难言司法公正。北京市海淀区人民检察院基于案件基数大，司法资源有限的实际，立足刑事诉讼立法精神，深入实际调查，加强理论论证，会同同级人民法院，对那些事实清楚，证据充分，被告人承认起诉指控但又不符合适用简易程序条件的案件，尝试简化普通程序，大大缩短了案件审理时限，优化配置了司法资源，突出了刑法和刑事司法的打击重点，是一次有益的尝试和探索。普通程序简易审已被高检院列为公诉工作七项改革之一。 “情无穷，法有限”。抽象化、定型化的法律只有在司法实践中，不断加以检验，才会更加完善；通过积极实践，我们的执法方法、司法体制，才会更加符合公正司法的要求。
In recent years, the reform of criminal trial methods has always been the central aspect of judicial reform, and widespread public concern. Like other judicial reforms, the goal of criminal trial reform is twofold: realizing and safeguarding judicial fairness through reform; and improving judicial efficiency through reform. Although this is a goal that runs side by side, it can hardly be justified in the context of low judicial efficiency. Based on the large base of cases and the limited judicial resources, Haidian District People’s Procuratorate of Beijing based on the legislative spirit of criminal procedure, conducted in-depth investigations and theoretical argumentation, together with people’s courts at the same level, tried to convict those accused of facts However, they are not in conformity with the applicable procedures of summary procedure. It is a useful attempt and exploration to try to streamline the ordinary procedure, greatly shorten the time limit for trial, optimize the allocation of judicial resources, highlight the focus of criminal law and criminal justice. Ordinary procedure summary examination has been high prosecutors as one of seven reform of public prosecution. “Love is infinite, the law is limited.” Abstraction and finalized laws will only be improved if they are tested in judicial practice. Only through active practice will our law enforcement and judiciary systems be more in line with the requirements of impartial justice.