在当代知识量化的大环境下,于思想、语言、行动领域试图复兴质性标准,必面临挑战。通过对当今世界上三大文化范式即现代派、后现代派和求智派的比较与评估可以发现:现代派将文化分离于关于实在的知识;后现代派倡导知识建基于实在但却拥护一种本体论暴力;求智派主张对智慧和美的自由而尽责之追求,并以此促进基于非暴力本体论的文化。然而,对于非暴力的、质性的本体论知识的学术追求却被现代派和后现代派所否认。这不仅构成对哲学和美术的抨击,也同样意味着对文明的冒犯。 Under the circumstance of quantifying contemporary knowledge, it is imperative to try to revive the qualitative standards in the field of thinking, language and action. Through the comparison and assessment of the three major cultural paradigms in the world, that is, the modernist, the post-modernist and the intellectualist, we can find that the modernist separates the culture from the knowledge about reality; the postmodernist advocates knowledge based on reality but advocates one Kind of ontological violence; the Pursuitists advocate the pursuit of responsibility for the freedom of wisdom and beauty and, as a result, promote a culture based on non-violent ontology. However, the academic pursuit of nonviolent, qualitative ontological knowledge has been denied by both modernist and postmodernist. This not only constitutes a criticism of philosophy and fine arts, but also implies offensive to civilization.