论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比传统经腹子宫肌瘤剜除术与腹腔镜下肌瘤剜除术的临床疗效。方法:选择28例子宫肌瘤患者为研究对象,随机分成观察组与对照组,每组各14例,对照组采取常规经腹子宫肌瘤剜除术,观察组采取腹腔镜下肌瘤剜除术。结果:观察组患者术中出血量、术后排气时间及住院时间均要少于对照组,P<0.05。结论:在子宫肌瘤的治疗上,腹腔镜肌瘤剜除数比传统经腹子宫肌瘤剜除术的优点多,并且术后并发症发生率也较低,值得推广。
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of traditional abdominal myomectomy and laparoscopic myomectomy. Methods: Twenty-eight cases of uterine fibroids were selected as study subjects and randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 14 cases in each group. The control group was treated by conventional abdominal myomectomy, and the observation group was treated with laparoscopic myomectomy Surgery. Results: The bleeding volume, postoperative exhaust time and hospital stay in the observation group were all less than those in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of uterine fibroids, laparoscopic myomectomy than traditional transabdominal myomectomy has many advantages, and the incidence of postoperative complications is also low, it is worth promoting.