论文部分内容阅读
医疗事故鉴定及医疗损害赔偿的法律适用是医疗损害诉讼中的两大问题,但由于理论界、实务界对其相关规定存在着不同看法,因此形成了实践中的混乱和复杂局面。通过对相关法律法规的分析、比较,认为医学会并非唯一的医疗事故技术鉴定机构,医疗事故鉴定并非处理医疗纠纷案件的必经程序,不能用法医类鉴定代替医疗事故鉴定;对起诉到法院的医疗损害赔偿案件,不论是否构成医疗事故,均可按填平原则赔偿权利人的损失。
The legal application of the identification of medical malpractice and the compensation for medical damages are the two major problems in the lawsuit of medical damages. However, due to the different views on the relevant provisions in the theoretical circles and practical circles, confusion and complicated situation in practice have been formed. Through the analysis and comparison of related laws and regulations, it is considered that medical association is not the only technical appraisement institution for medical malpractice. Medical appraisement is not a necessary procedure to deal with medical dispute cases. Forensic medical appraisal can not be used to replace medical appraisement; Compensation cases for medical damages, whether or not they constitute a medical accident, may be compensated for the loss of the right holder according to the principle of “leveling out”.