如果某人宣称:他的诗写真的只关乎个人(抛开自卫的心理),这似乎意味着他缺乏真理或普遍性的维度,他是写一首算一首,被个人习性或外在的风吹着,既不知所从来也不关心去向;但如果他认为根本就没有、甚至不需要个人的诗学呢?或许,他竟暗自鼓劲于这样一个妄念:以为真的可以超越当代中国人的局限,而直接以诗在道义中发言?我希望我属于后一种情况,不再汲汲于虚的东西,在“技艺”、“翻译”等 If someone claims that his poem is about individuals (putting aside self-defense psychology), it seems to mean that he lacks the dimension of truth or universality and that he writes a first count, calculated by personal habits or externalities The wind blows, neither know nor never care about whereabouts; but if he thinks there is no, or even do not need personal poetics? Perhaps, he secretly encouraged by such a fantasy: that really can surpass contemporary Chinese Limitations, but directly in the poem in moral? I hope I belong to the latter case, no longer draw on the imaginary things, in “skills”, “translation” and so on