论文部分内容阅读
关于对学术研究“顶天立地”的评价,我们必须有一个辩证弹性的思维。也就是说,不能简单地用“1+1=2”的量化思维来认识学术研究的顶天立地。一方面,我们要承认,顶天立地是可以评价的,是有一个评价标准的,特别是自然科学以及部分社会科学。这种评价标准来自三个方面:第一,是在自然科学上的一些重大发现。从人类研究自然界的进程来看,就是一个不断接近自然原貌的过程。当然,我们不能机械地理解自然界的本来面貌。自然面貌总是与人的实践紧密相连的。人
With regard to the evaluation of academic research “indomitable spirit ”, we must have a dialectical and flexible thinking. In other words, we can not simply use the quantitative thinking of “1 + 1 = 2 ” to recognize the primacy of academic research. On the one hand, we must admit that it is self-assessing and has a standard of evaluation, especially the natural sciences and some social sciences. This evaluation criteria come from three aspects: First, some major discoveries in the natural sciences. From the perspective of the study of mankind in nature, it is a process that keeps close to the original appearance of nature. Of course, we can not mechanically understand the true nature of nature. The natural appearance is always closely linked with human practice. people