论文部分内容阅读
《辽史·地理志》中记载辽代的州有节度、刺史、防御、观察四类,《百官志》记载有节度、刺史、防御、观察、团练五类。两相比较,《辽史·百官志》与《地理志》中关于辽代州的记载不同的部分,应为《百官志》杂抄本纪、列传及其他史料,或为史臣修史时漏载所导致的。其相同的部分,应具有共同的史源,即耶律俨《皇朝实录》。早在耶律俨修《实录》之时,就已经将不同时期的记载未加考辩而仅仅是罗列在一起了。《辽史·地理志》与《百官志》记载的混乱,恐怕不能完全归咎于元代史臣。
There are four categories recorded in the History of Liao Dynasty and Geographical Records: the Liao Dynasty, the prefectures, the governors, the defenders and the observers. In comparison with the two records, the different parts of Liao Dynasty written in Liao Shi · Huiguanzhi and Geographical Chi should be copied from the official records of the Baoguang, copied from other sources, or used as historical records Leakage caused by. The same part, should have a common source, that is, Yelv Yan “Dynasty Record.” As early as Yelv Yen obsessed with “Record,” it has been recorded in different periods unadjusted and just listed together. The confusion recorded in the History of Liao, Geography and the Officials of the Hundred officials can not entirely be attributed to the historian of the Yuan Dynasty.