经过多年“有组织的”司法治理方式的改革,中国乡村司法的主体、标准和程序都发生了一些显著的变化。但是,与这种变化形成鲜明反差的是,司法运行中长期存在的简约逻辑却从未发生根本改变。对当今中国乡村司法所具有的“第三领域”性质的考察,促使我们不得不重新检视这种简约逻辑的内在结构与运行模式,通过回答“何谓简约”“如何简约”“为何简约”三个问题,初步归纳出中国乡村司法过程的性质,以及造成这些性质的多重策略之间的矛盾扭结。 After many years of “organized” judicial reform, some notable changes have taken place in the subjects, standards and procedures of Chinese rural justice. However, in sharp contrast to this change, there has never been a fundamental change in the simple logic long-standing in judicial operation. The examination of the nature of the “third field” that contemporary Chinese rural jurisdictions make us have to re-examine the internal structure and mode of operation of this minimalist logic by answering the question of “what is minimalism” “Why Simple ” three issues, initially summed up the nature of the Chinese rural judicial process, as well as the resulting multi-strategy of these conflicts between the kink.