论文部分内容阅读
探究注意缺陷多动障碍(attention deficit hyperactivity disorder,ADHD)儿童在不同Stroop任务中干扰控制能力的表现,研究Stroop效应能否成为检验ADHD干扰控制的标准。对15名参加实验的ADHD儿童,以及在年龄和其他方面相匹配的15名正常健康的控制组儿童,运用三种材料引发Stroop效应,即“Color-naming-Stroop”、“CountingStroop”和“Fruit-Stroop”。结果显示ADHD组儿童在“Color-naming”Stroop任务中比控制组的儿童的干扰分数更高,在“Fruit”Stroop中也比较显著,但是在“Counting”Stroop任务中的差异不显著。这样的结果说明,ADHD儿童伴有一定的干扰控制,但是Stroop范式仅能作为检测ADHD儿童干扰控制的参考。
To investigate whether children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) interfere with their ability to control in different Stroop tasks and to investigate whether Stroop effect can be used as a criterion to test ADHD interference control. Fifteen children with ADHD participated in the experiment, as well as 15 age-matched and normal children in the control group, using three materials to trigger the Stroop effect, namely “Color-naming-Stroop”, “CountingStroop ”And“ Fruit-Stroop ”. The results showed that children with ADHD had higher scores of interference in the “Color-naming ” Stroop task than children in the control group and also significant in “Fruit ” Stroop, but in the “Counting ” Stroop task The difference was not significant. This result shows that ADHD children with some interference control, but the Stroop paradigm can only be used as a reference to detect interference in children with ADHD control.