论文部分内容阅读
丘克辉同志在《郑和下西洋的宝船考》(载《航海》一九八三年第二期)一文中,介绍了学术界、航海界对宝船尺度的不同意见,引起了我的兴趣。经查阅有关史料,我认为,《明史·郑和传》关于宝船尺度“修四十四丈,广十八丈”的记载是正确的,不能轻易否定。明代人对宝船尺度的记载并非仅见于《<瀛涯胜览>序》。顾起元《客座赘语》卷一载:“今城之西北有宝船厂。永乐三年三月,命太监郑和等,行赏赐古里满刺诸国。通计官校、旗员、勇士、士民、买办、书手,共二万七千八百七十余员,名宝船,共六十三号。(笔者按:《明史》作‘六十二’。一艘之差,显为记误或
Comrade Qiu Kehui introduced my disagreement on the scale of treasure ships in the academic and navigational circles in his article entitled “The Voyage of Zheng He’s Voyage to the West” (contained in “The Voyage”, Issue Two, 1983). It aroused my interest. After reviewing the relevant historical materials, I think it is correct that Mao Zedong and Zheng He Chuan’s account of the treasure ship’s standard of “fixing forty-four feet and broad eighteen feet” can not be easily denied. Records of the Ming Dynasty on the scale of the treasure ship are not only found in the preface to “The History of Yingsheng Sights”. Gu Qiyuan “Visitors” said: “The city of Northwest has a treasure shipyard. Yongle three years in March, ordered the eunuch Zheng He, trip reward Guli full of thorns .Total government school, the flag clerk, Warriors , The people, the comprador, the book hand, a total of 27,870 people, named Po Ship, a total of 63. (The author by: ”Ming Shi" as ’sixty-two’. Wrong or wrong record