论文部分内容阅读
目的掌握南方某部边海防驻地自备水源水质状况,指导部队科学管理和改造营区的自备水源。方法按照《生活饮用水卫生标准》(GB5749—2006)、《生活饮用水标准检验方法》(GB5750—2006)对南方某部边海防营区(主要为广西、广东和海南边防驻地)的88个自备水源的水源类型、水源水质卫生状况、卫生防护和消毒等方面进行调查分析,对自备水源进行采样以及实验室检测与评价。结果共调查88个自备水源,其中66个无任何消毒药物及设备,22个水源有不定期简易消毒;77个设有防护设施。88个水源中全部合格的水源有28个,合格率为31.82%;感官性状指标合格的水源有69个,占78.41%;一般化学指标合格的水源有78个,占88.64%;毒理学指标合格的水源有79个,占89.77%;微生物指标合格的水源有52个,占59.09%。细菌总数超标的水源有25个,总大肠菌群超标的水源有31个。浑浊度超标水源17个,超标率分别为28.41%、35.22%、19.32%。结论南方某部边海防驻地自备水源水质超标项目较多,应加强水源水质改造,搞好水源卫生防护,加强水源水质监督监测管理。
Objective To understand the water quality of self-owned water sources in Haiphong stationed by a certain southern part of the country and guide the troops in scientific management and reconstruction of the self-provided water sources in the camp. Methods According to the standards of Sanitary Standard of Domestic Drinking Water (GB5749-2006) and Standard Test Method for Domestic Drinking Water (GB5750-2006), 88 samples from the Coastal Defense Area (mainly the border posts of Guangxi, Guangdong and Hainan Provinces) The type of water source, the water quality and sanitation status, health protection and disinfection and other aspects of the investigation and analysis of self-provided water sampling and laboratory testing and evaluation. Results A total of 88 self-contained water sources were investigated, of which 66 were free of any disinfectant and equipment, 22 were disinfected irregularly and 77 were equipped with protective equipment. There were 28 qualified water sources in all 88 water sources, with a pass rate of 31.82%. There were 69 water sources qualified for sensory traits, accounting for 78.41%; 78 qualified water sources for general chemical indicators (88.64%); toxicological indicators were qualified There are 79 water sources, accounting for 89.77%. There are 52 water sources qualified for microbial indicators, accounting for 59.09%. There were 25 water sources that exceeded the total number of bacteria and 31 water sources that exceeded the total coliform bacteria. Turbidity exceeded 17 water sources, exceeding the standard rates were 28.41%, 35.22%, 19.32%. Conclusions There are more projects with excessive water quality of self-provided water sources in Haiphong station on the southern part of the country. Water quality improvement should be strengthened, health protection of water sources should be improved, and monitoring and management of water quality supervision should be strengthened.