论文部分内容阅读
应菲律宾单方面请求建立的南海仲裁案仲裁庭,最近就其是否对菲方有关主张享有管辖权作出了裁决。虽然它只明确裁定对菲律宾提出的15项主张中的部分具有管辖权,但是仲裁庭的论证在若干方面显得比较薄弱。尤其是在海洋划界和领土主权问题不属于仲裁庭管辖权范畴时,仲裁庭继续审理本案是否适当受到质疑。
The arbitration tribunal of the South China Sea, which was established upon the request of the Philippines unilaterally, recently ruled whether it has jurisdiction over the Philippine side’s claim. Although it has only expressly ruled that it has jurisdiction over part of the 15 claims put forward by the Philippines, the Arbitral Tribunal’s argument appears to be weak in a number of ways. In particular, when the issue of maritime delimitation and territorial sovereignty does not fall within the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal, the arbitral tribunal continues to hear whether the case is properly challenged.