论文部分内容阅读
在中国史学史上,清代帝王对史馆修史的干预最为严重,其表现主要有四个方面:第一,很多修史项目由皇帝亲自发起修纂;第二,形成了史书修纂次第进呈御览的制度;第三,对史书修纂内容进行全面干预,大到修史指导思想,小到史书字词推敲,皇帝都要给予具体指示;第四,亲自过问史官的任用和史馆的管理。清代帝王对史馆修史的全面干预,使得史馆成为政治与史学互动的重要链环,促进了官方史学的繁荣,成就了维系中国古代史学连续发展的主要力量,主导了史学发展的方向。但帝王干预修史对史学发展有着严重的负面影响,它抹杀了史学所具有的批判现实的锋芒,遏制了史学思想的创新发展,把史学变成了政治的附庸。
In the history of Chinese historiography, the imperial emperors in the Qing Dynasty interfered with the history of the history of the museum most seriously, and its performance was mainly in four aspects: first, many history-reform projects were initiated by the emperor personally; secondly, Thirdly, we should comprehensively intervene in the compilation of history books, ranging from the guiding ideology of history revision to the scrutiny of history books, and the emperor should give specific instructions. Fourth, we must personally ask about the appointment of historians and the management of the History Museum. The comprehensive intervention by the imperial emperors of the Qing Dynasty in the history of the History Museum made the History Museum an important link in the interaction between politics and history, promoted the prosperity of the official historiography, and achieved the major force that maintained the continuous development of ancient Chinese history and dominated the development of historiography. However, the imperial intervention in history has a serious negative impact on the development of history. It erases the critical reality of historiography, curbs the innovation and development of historical thought, and turns historiography into the appendage of politics.