论文部分内容阅读
编辑同志:去年10月,浙江某器材公司与北京某精密设备有限公司签订了购买生产线合同。双方约定:某器材公司购买生产线设备,总价款90万元。卖方北京某精密设备有限公司于今年3月10日前交货并负责安装调试好。买方某器材公司应在调试完毕正常生产后3日内付清全部货款。合同签订后,某精密设备公司直到3月底才交货,且经多次调试均不能正常生产,直到4月15日请来技术专家调试,设备才正常运转。由于某器材公司外债没有收回,拖到4月底,某器材公司才支付货款。双方为此发生纠纷,都要求对方支付违约金。请问,在这种情况下,双方的责任应当如何认定?陕西师立明
Edit comrades: Last October, a equipment company in Zhejiang and Beijing Precision Equipment Co., Ltd. signed a contract to purchase production lines. The two sides agreed: a equipment company to buy production line equipment, the total price of 900,000 yuan. The seller of a Beijing Precision Equipment Co., Ltd. in March 10 this year before delivery and is responsible for installation and commissioning. The buyer of a equipment company should be completed within 3 days after commissioning the normal payment of full payment. After the contract was signed, a precision equipment company was not delivered until the end of March and could not be normally produced after many times of commissioning. Until April 15, commissioned by a technical expert, the equipment was in normal operation. As a equipment company did not recover the foreign debt, dragged to the end of April, a equipment company to pay the purchase price. Disputes between the two sides for this reason, require each other to pay liquidated damages. Excuse me, in this case, how should the two sides identify the responsibility? Shaanxi Li Liming