论文部分内容阅读
近几年来,国内学者相继地发表了好几种选择性培养基及鉴别性培养基分离痢疾菌的效果比较资料。从他们所报导的结果看来,自制选择性培养基的效果都显著地较鉴别性培养基为优;但同时也说明,无论哪一种培养基单独使用的效果均仍不够理想,而且比较的范围不广。因而有必要继续并广泛地比较国内现认为较满意的分离培养基,从中选择数种推广于我军,以免在选用培养基时无所适从。为此,在1957年3月间我院曾和我军10个兄弟单位举行过联席会议,明确了与会各单位的分工和任务,会上决定由我们分担8-10种培养基的效果比较。我们的工作分二阶段完成,这里总结的是第一阶段的结果。
In recent years, domestic scholars have published a number of selective media and identification of the separation of dysentery bacteria culture media comparison. From the results they reported, home-made selective medium was significantly better than that of the discriminating medium, but at the same time it showed that the effect of either medium alone was not satisfactory, The scope is not wide. Therefore, it is necessary to continue and widely compare the currently available separation media in our country and select several of them for promotion in our army, so as to avoid being at a loss when choosing culture media. For this reason, in March 1957, our hospital held a joint meeting with 10 units of our army to clarify the division of labor and tasks of the participating units. It was decided at that time that we would share the effect of 8-10 mediums. Our work is completed in two phases. Here we summarize the results of the first phase.