论文部分内容阅读
比利时布鲁塞尔上诉法院支持布鲁塞尔初审法院在2007年对Copiepresse v.Google的判决,该案件最终以Google的败诉告终。通过简要介绍该案,评述了Google的“网页快照”与“Google新闻”的法律性质,指出“网页快照”与“Google新闻”服务在比利时不适用避风港原则和合理使用原则,从而构成对复制权和向公众传播权的侵犯。通过比较研究后,强调要因地制宜地规范搜索引擎在中国的发展。
The Brussels Court of Appeal in Brussels supported the judgment of the Brussels Court of First Instance against Copiepresse v. Google in 2007, which ultimately ended in a defeat by Google. By briefly introducing the case, the legal nature of Google's “Web Snapshots” and “Google News” is commented, noting that the “Web Snapshots” and “Google News” services do not apply to safe haven principles and reasonable in Belgium Use of the principle that constitutes an infringement of the right of reproduction and communication to the public. After comparing and researching, it emphasizes to regulate the development of search engine in China according to the local conditions.