论文部分内容阅读
我在河北省中师语文年会上(八五年宣化)曾经提交了拙文《中师(古代汉语)常识识问题探讨》.弹指十年,中师《语文基础知识》由原来的六册书变为现今的三册,而现行第三册中《古代汉语常识》部分也作了不少修改和订正.例如:卻克伤于矢”(《左传·成公二年》)写成“欲克伤于矢”(《左传·威公二年》)一句出两错的情况没有了.(原错见第六册第七十八页)然而,既然要讲古代汉语的常识,理应概念准确,引例精当且内容尽可能地完备些,依此标准衡量.仍觉有许多问题值得思考与辩明.今依教材顺序,探讨有关问题.
My Hebei Normal University (Xuanhua) in 1985 submitted an essay entitled “Zhong Shi (Ancient Chinese) common sense to explore the topic.” Ten years, the teacher’s “basic knowledge of Chinese” from the original six books Into the present three volumes, and the third part of the current book, “Ancient Chinese common sense” part also made a lot of changes and revisions. For example: but grams of injury in the vector “(” Zuo Chenggong two years “) wrote” (“Zuo Wei Wei two years”) a sentence out of two wrong situation. (Formerly see Volume VI, p. 78) However, since you want to talk about the ancient Chinese common sense, it should be the concept Accurate, citing examples and content as complete as possible, according to this standard.It still seems there are many problems worth thinking about and discerning.According to the sequence of teaching materials, to explore the issue.