论文部分内容阅读
产品质量法对产品缺陷有这样的解释:“本法所称缺陷,是指产品存在危及人身、他人财产(指缺陷产品以外的其他财产——编者注)安全的不合理的危险;产品有保障人体健康,人身、财产安全的国家标准、行业标准的,是指不符合该标准。”根据这一解释,安全与价格本是无须争论的问题,却引发了一场争论。这使开发安全型产品成为一种“冒险”——开发高投入能否得到市场回报?当“安全第一”为人普遍接受后,我们是不是该反思一下,如何把“安全第一”的观点贯彻到各行各业中去?
The product quality law has such an explanation for product defects: “The defects mentioned in this Law refer to the unreasonable danger that the product poses dangers to the safety of persons and other people’s assets (other than the property of the defective product - the editor’s note); Safeguarding human health, national standards and industry standards for personal and property safety means not complying with the standard. ”According to this interpretation, safety and price are issues that need not be debated, but it has triggered an argument. This makes the development of safe products into an “adventure” - the development of high investment can get the market return? When the “safety first” is generally accepted, we should not reflect on how to “security The first ”point of view" is implemented in all walks of life?