李清照《词论》思想正解——也以李八郎之例的解读为基础

来源 :文学遗产 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:zhuang_3210
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
由于缺少文本以外的材料可资佐证,对《词论》的正确解读只能通过文本细读求得突破。李八郎之例承前启后,殊为关键,论者以此为切入点,确是解决问题的新途径。但李清照对李八郎故事作了大幅度改写,考证原故事发生时间已没有实际意义。深入分析可发现李清照是有意将此故事放在盛唐的历史语境下予以叙述,借此说明词胎息于其时流行的胡部新声,具有可歌性。因此,首句应断为“乐府声、诗并著最盛于唐。开元、天宝间,有李八郎者……”“乐府”指词,“著”当“着”讲,“声、诗并著”意为“声、词相从”。李清照虽认为唐是词“声、词相从”的鼎盛时代,但并非最高典范。《词论》的立足点是宋代,李清照对宋词的趋雅倾向持肯定与欣赏态度,“别是一家”只是对其时词丧失可歌这一基本属性的反拨,并无回归词的传统风格与反对诗、词合流的意向。总而言之,李清照推崇治世之音,可歌与雅正是其词学批评的两大标准。 Due to the lack of material outside the text can be evidence, the correct interpretation of the “theory of the word” can only be achieved through textual breakthroughs. The case of Li Hachiro, the predecessor of the Republic of Korea, was the key. As a starting point, the author regarded it as a new way to solve the problem. But Li Qingzhao made a drastic rewriting of the story of Li Hachiro, and the textual research on the time when the original story happened has no practical significance. Through in-depth analysis, we can find that Li Qingzhao intentionally narrates this story under the historical context of the prosperous Tang Dynasty. Therefore, the first sentence should be broken as “Yuefu sound, poetry and the most flourishing in the Tang Dynasty. Kaiyuan, Tianbao, there are Li Hachiro ... ” “Yuefu” refers to the word, “with ” when “Say, ” sound, poetry and the “meaning” sound, the phrase from “. Although Li Qingzhao believes Tang is the heyday of the word ”sound and phrase from“, it is not the highest example. The standpoint of ”Ci Lun“ is that in the Song Dynasty, Li Qingzhao held positive attitudes toward the tendency of elegance of the Song poetry. ”Do not be the same" is only a backlash against the basic attribute of loss of time, The traditional style and the opposition poem, word intertwined intention. All in all, Li Qingzhao respected the sound of governing the world, and songwriting and elegance were the two major criteria of Ci-poetry criticism.
其他文献