论文部分内容阅读
“工人诗歌”在新世纪被再次提出,创作主体社会身份的复杂性,使其与十七年时期的工人诗歌虽有差异,却有着深刻的联系。探究它产生的文化土壤,不免让人回忆起20世纪末那场“新左派”和“自由主义”的激烈论争,而媒体对“工人诗歌”的介入,以及“工人诗歌”与“打工诗歌”的内在关联,更使得“工人诗歌”成为一个需要进一步讨论的概念。当下对“工人诗歌”的解读和评价,囿于“工人”的阶级性与“诗歌”的文学性,二者的混杂交叠恰恰透露了一些存在的现实问题。我们眼下亟须关注的是“工人诗歌”在之后发展过程中的独立性与完整性。
“Workers ’Poetry ” is again put forward in the new century. The complexity of the social identity of the main body of creation makes it have a profound connection with the workers’ poetry in the 17 years. Exploring the cultural soil it generates can not help but remind us of the heated debate between the “new left” and “liberalism” at the end of the 20th century, and the media’s involvement in “worker’s poetry” and the “worker’s poetry ”And “ working poetry ”the internal association, but also makes “ worker poetry ”become a need for further discussion of the concept. The current interpretation and evaluation of “worker’s poetry” is due to the class nature of “worker ” and the literary nature of “poetry ”, and the mixed overlap of the two just reveals some existing practical problems. What we need to pay close attention to now is the independence and completeness of “worker’s poetry” in the subsequent development.