论文部分内容阅读
科普期刊快速地融入市场使得科普类期刊现行的评估标准与之不相协调。科普期刊工作者最为关注的是如何求得生存与发履而不是期刊的评估标准。改革或完善评估体系势在必行。现行体系存在与科普期刊工作者关心的话题相距较远,未能考虑科普期刊的市场属性,未能区分期刊本身的质量和其延伸方面的质量,部分指标归类不合逻辑等问题。建议构建新的科普期刊的评价体系,可以分成综合性评价和单项指标的评价(如编辑质量的评价),并认为评价可从期刊本身的质量和其延伸方面着手。
The rapid integration of popular science journals into the market makes the current evaluation criteria of popular science journals unmatched. The most concern of science journals workers is how to survive and performance rather than journals evaluation criteria. It is imperative to reform or perfect the assessment system. The existing system is far away from the topic of concern of science journals journalists, failing to consider the market attributes of science journals, failing to distinguish between the quality of journals themselves and the quality of their extension, and the illogicality of some indicators. It is suggested that the evaluation system for constructing new science journals be divided into the comprehensive evaluation and the evaluation of individual indicators (such as the evaluation of editorial quality), and the evaluation can be based on the quality of the periodical itself and its extension.