论文部分内容阅读
20世纪初,由梁启超等倡导的“新史学”以进化论为理念,致力于寻求中国历史演变的规律,《中国通史》的写作成为重塑史学形象的尝试,梁启超、章太炎都有过写作计划。20年代之后,在科学话语之下,史学界转而崇尚实证,不做宏观概括和反对疏通成为史学界潮流,通史写作相对淡化。但是,在时事的激荡之下,“九·一八”事变之后,教育部规定各高校均要设置“中国通史”课程。在学术界,“通史”的写作也成为一时之需,涌现出钱穆等撰著的几部著名通史著作;甚至于宣传“历史学不是著史”、“反对疏通”的傅斯年也转而注重史学的经世功能,撰写了《东北通史》这样的现实感极强的著作。
At the beginning of the 20th century, “New Historiography ” advocated by Liang Qichao and others was based on the concept of evolution with the aim of seeking the law of the evolution of Chinese history. The writing of “General History of China” was an attempt to reshape the image of history. Both Liang Qichao and Zhang Taiyan had written plan. After the 1920s, under the scientific discourse, historians turned to positivism instead of macroscopically summarizing and opposition to becoming the trend of historiography, and the writing of general history was relatively diluted. However, under the turmoil of current affairs and after the “9.18 Incident”, the Ministry of Education stipulated that all colleges and universities should set up the “General History of China” course. In academia, the writing of “General History” has also become a temporary necessity. Several well-known books of general history emanating from Qian Mu emerged. Even the propaganda of “History Not History” and “Anti-dodging” But also pay more attention to the historiography of the function of the world, wrote a strong sense of reality such as “Northeast History.”