爲什麼在紀念米丘林百週年的時候來批判農業地質學派呢?很簡單,因爲農業地質學派,在土壤學的理論上,在生產實踐的意義上都是與米丘林農業生物科學的原則相矛盾的。米丘林的農業生物科學的理論是奠立在辯證唯物主義與歷史唯物主義之上,它不僅耍認識自然,它還要改造自然,它不僅要發現,它還要創造。農業地質學派恰恰相反,它的學術理論奠立在庸俗的經驗主義與機械論之上,所以它解釋不了自然,也更無改造自然的企圖與能力。當祖國正在向社會主義邁進的時候,土壤科學工作者應當深刻地檢查與批判土壤科學內的虛偽部分;向正確的、偉大的米丘林農業生物科學理論學習;不讓我們自已在建設祖國的科學大軍中成為落伍者,不讓我們給建 Why criticize the school of agro-geology at the time of the centennial commemoration of Michurin? Because the school of agro-geology, in the theory of soil science, in the sense of production practice, is in line with the principles of Michurin’s agrobiology contradictory. Michurin’s theory of agricultural biological science is based on dialectical materialism and historical materialism. It not only recognizes nature but also reforms nature. It not only finds out, but it also creates. On the contrary, the school of agricultural geology, whose academic theory is based on vulgar empiricism and mechanistic theory, can not explain nature or even attempt to reform nature. While the motherland is moving towards socialism, soil scientists should profoundly examine and criticize the hypocrisy in soil science; learn from the correct and great Michurin’s theory of agricultural biological science; and let us not make our own efforts in building the motherland Become a laggard in the army of science, let us give build