论文部分内容阅读
本案系一起建设工程施工合同抗诉案,本案的焦点在于本案是否属于重复诉讼以及当事人法律责任的承担问题。本文在分析基本案情及诉讼过程后,集中阐释了了一事不再理原则的相关理论及立法现状,并对前后两诉进行了比较分析。关于法律责任的承担,本文集中分析了无权代理、表见代理、委托代理和职务行为的联系及区别,揭示法理,并对再审判决予以评判,以期为同类型案件提供参考。
This case is to build a construction contract with the case of protest, the focus of this case is whether the case belongs to duplicate litigation and the parties bear the responsibility of legal issues. After analyzing the basic merits and litigation process, this article focuses on the relevant theory of the no-reason principle and the status quo of legislation, and makes a comparative analysis of two cases before and after. With regard to the assumption of legal liability, this paper focuses on the connection and difference between the powerless agent, the agent on the face, the agent and the duty, reveals the jurisprudence, and judges the retrial verdict with a view to providing reference for the same type of case.