论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨灾难救助者替代性创伤与特质应对方式及社会支持的关系。方法采用替代性创伤问卷、特质应对方式问卷(TCSQ)与社会支持评定量表(SSRS)对91名灾难救助者进行调查。结果①不同性别救助者在替代性创伤上行为反应这一维度得分存在显著差(t=-2.335,P<0.05);②灾难救助者消极应对分量表得分,除了认知反应这一维度外,与替代性创伤各维度呈显著正相关(r=0.381,P<0.05);积极应对分量表得分除认知反应和生活信念外,与替代性创伤各维度呈显著负相关(r=-0.286,P<0.01);③社会支持总分与情绪反应呈显著负相关(r=-0.252)。结论倾向于采用积极应对方式的灾难救助者,其创伤程度较低;而倾向于采用消极应对方式的灾难救助者,其创伤程度较高;灾难救助者得到的社会支持越多,则其情绪反应越少。
Objective To explore the relationship between alternative trauma and trait coping mode and social support of disaster relief workers. Methods A total of 91 disaster rescuers were investigated using the Alternative Trauma Questionnaire, the TraitQuest Questionnaire (TCSQ) and the Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS). Results ① There was a significant difference in the scores of behavioral responses to alternative trauma between two groups (t = -2.335, P <0.05). ② Disaster rescues negatively responded to the subscales scale. Except for the dimension of cognitive response, (R = 0.381, P <0.05). There was a significant negative correlation between the score of active coping and the dimensions of alternative trauma (r = -0.286, P <0.01). ③ The total score of social support was negatively correlated with emotion (r = -0.252). Conclusion The disaster rescuers who tend to adopt a positive coping style have a lower degree of trauma and the disaster rescuers who prefer passive coping methods have a higher degree of trauma. The more social support a disaster rescuer receives, the more their emotional reactions The less.