论文部分内容阅读
中国文学史上对废名有两种完全不同的评价,一种是以鲁迅为代表的,认为废名是“为艺术而艺术”派,一种是以周作人为代表,认为废名是写实派。为什么对废名的评价会有如此大的差异?这是本文要解决的问题。本文通过对历史语境的还原和对废名文学道路的考察,认为废名走的是一条以真实表现现实生活感受的诗性写作的道路。由于废名的文学道路与新文学运动激进的文学主张之间的分歧,从而导致了文学史家对废名的误解和忽视。
In the history of Chinese literature, there are two completely different opinions on the name of the poem. One is represented by Lu Xun and the other is that the poem is “art for art”, while the other is represented by “Zhou Zuoren” send. Why there is such a big difference in the evaluation of Fei name? This is the problem to be solved by this article. Through the reduction of the historical context and the investigation of the literature of Fei Ming, this thesis holds that taking Fei Ming as a path is a poetic writing which realizes the real life experience. Due to the disagreement between Fei Ming’s literary path and the radical literary proposition of the New Literature Movement, the historians of literature led to the misunderstanding and neglect of the Fei Ming.