学生评教是我国目前高等院校普遍采用的课堂教学质量评估手段之一,评教结果被广泛运用于教师职称评定、教师荣誉评选、教师岗位定级、教师奖励性绩效工资分配等各方面与教师的关切度越来越高;在实际操作过程中,对于学生参与评教存在争议。支持者认为大学生具备足够的认知和判断能力,能够做出符合预期的评价,结果真实可靠。反对者则更多地担忧这种行为对于教师心理、课堂教学行为、教学要求和质量的影响,比如说迁就和迎合学生,删减教学内容,降低难度等。更有教师直呼“师尊何存”。 The evaluation of students is one of the most commonly used methods of classroom teaching quality assessment in colleges and universities at present. The results of appraising teaching are widely used in various aspects such as the assessment of teachers’ professional titles, the selection of teachers’ honors, the grades of teachers, the distribution of teachers’ Teachers’ concerns are getting higher and higher; in practice, there is controversy over the participation of students in teaching evaluation. Proponents believe that college students have enough cognitive and judgment skills to make predictable evaluations and the results are truthful and reliable. Opponents are more concerned about the impact of such behavior on teachers’ psychology, classroom teaching, teaching requirements and quality, such as accommodating and cater to students, reducing teaching content and reducing difficulty. More teachers say “Master what save ”.