论文部分内容阅读
目的:检索2011—2020年我国恶性肿瘤手术隔离技术相关研究的文献并进行文献计量学分析。方法:基于协和图书馆文献检索系统以“恶性肿瘤手术隔离技术”等为检索词在中国知网、万方数据库、维普、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、Embase、CINAHL护理学数据库等中检索文献，检索时间均为2011年1月1日—2020年12月31日。采用NoteExpress软件进行文献管理并进行分析。结果:共检索出中文文献21 034篇，英文文献1 509篇，按照排除标准筛选后最终纳入文献304篇，均为中文文献。其中论著类文章119篇，护理配合类95篇，经验总结类68篇，综述21篇，专家共识1篇；共分布于125种医学期刊；其中核心期刊论文数37篇（12.17%），基金论文数23篇（7.57%）；《医药前沿》《医学信息》《世界最新医学信息文摘》为发文最多期刊前3名；文献共来自261个发文机构，每个机构平均发文量1.16篇，发文量前3名省份分别为江苏省（46篇）、四川省（25篇）、广东省（20篇）；前3位高频词为“无瘤技术”“腹腔镜”“恶性肿瘤”；文献合著率为48.68%，合作度为1.91人，文献篇均被引频次3.57次。结论:我国恶性肿瘤手术隔离技术相关研究正在逐渐深入和发展，但依然存在着整体研究质量不高、研究地域差异明显、研究缺乏深度和系统性、研究内容单一等问题，需要开展更高质量的研究。“,”Objective:To search the literatures related to surgical isolation technology of malignant tumor in China from 2011 to 2020 and conduct bibliometric analysis.Methods:Based on the literature retrieval system of the Union Medical College, “surgical isolation technique for malignant tumor” and other search terms were used to retrieve literature from CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP, China Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Nursing Database. The retrieval time was from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2020. NoteExpress software was used for literature management and analysis.Results:A total of 21 034 Chinese literatures and 1 509 English literatures were retrieved. After screening according to the exclusion criteria, 304 literatures were finally included, all of which were Chinese literatures. Among them, there were 119 treatises, 95 nursing coordination articles, 68 experience summary articles, 21 reviews and 1 expert consensus. They were distributed in 125 medical journals. There were 37 core journal papers (12.17%) and 23 foundation papers (7.57%) . n Journal of Frontiers of Medicine, n Journal of Medical Information and n World Latest Medicine Information were the top 3 periodicals with the most publications. The literature came from 261 publishing institutions, and each institution published an average of 1.16 papers. The top 3 provinces in terms of published papers were Jiangsu Province (46 papers) , Sichuan Province (25 papers) and Guangdong Province (20 papers) . The top 3 high-frequency words were “tumor-free technology” “laparoscopy” and “malignant tumor”. The co-authorship rate of the literature was 48.68%, the degree of cooperation was 1.91 and the average citation frequency of the literature was 3.57 times.n Conclusions:Research on surgical isolation technology for malignant tumors in China is gradually deepening and developing, but there are still some problems, such as low overall research quality, obvious regional differences, lack of depth and systematization and single research content. It is necessary to carry out higher quality research.