论文部分内容阅读
本文从先秦语言文字角度分析了“其、之、是、也、所、而、且、斯”等八个虚词在《诗经商颂》中的用法,断定:“其、之、是”是西周语言的成分和“也、所、而、且、斯”为东周语言的成分。其八个虚词绝非商代语言的系统。在《诗经·商颂》中,八个虚词分布于《那》(且)、《烈祖》(斯)、《玄鸟》(之、所、而、是)、《长发》(其、之、也、且、是)、《殷武》(其、之、且、是)各篇之中,并有力说明了《商颂》五篇不是商代作品,而是东周时期的产物,年代正与《史记》中的宋襄公时代吻合。为《商颂》年代的争论中,“宋诗说”较“商诗说”合理。为语言文字资料与《诗经》作品断代的研究提供着参考性的作用。
This essay analyzes the usage of eight function words such as “its, its, its, its, and,” in the Book of Songs, from the perspective of pre-Qin language and writing, and concludes that “ ”Is the composition of the Western Zhou language and “, and, and Sri Lanka ”for the Eastern Zhou language components. Its eight function words are by no means the system of Shang language. In The Book of Songs, there are eight function words distributed in “That” (and), “Liezu” (斯), “玄玄” (and, And, yes, “and” Yin Wu “(and which, and is) each chapter, and strongly explain the” Shang Song “five is not the Shang Dynasty works, but the product of the Eastern Zhou Dynasty, the era Is consistent with the ”Historical Records“ in the era of Song Xiang public. For the ”business Chung“ era of controversy, ”Song said “ more ”commercial poetry that " reasonable. It provides a reference role for the study of the language and writing materials and the works of The Book of Songs.