目前学术界对《资本论》方法中的逻辑与历史一致性问题展开了研究和讨论,主要集中在《资本论》是否贯彻了逻辑与历史一致的原则。对这个问题,有两种对立的意见。一种认为,《资本论》的方法中没有把逻辑与历史一致当作一条原则来加以贯彻,逻辑与历史相一致并不是《资本论》辩证法的一个不可分割的部分,说《资本论》逻辑与历史一致是对马克思的方法做了黑格尔主义的歪曲。另一种意见则认为,《资本论》彻底贯彻了逻辑与历史一致的原则。认为《资本论》研究的主体是资本主义社会本身,在《资本论》中,逻辑无条件地同资本主义社会本身的历史一致,而同资本主义社会形成的历史和前资本主义社会的历史在某些地方一致,某些地方不一致。争论的双方有一 At present, academic circles have conducted research and discussion on the logic and historical consistency in the “capitalist” method, mainly focusing on whether “capitalism” has implemented the principle of consistency between logic and history. There are two opposing opinions on this issue. One thinks that the method of “capitalism” does not treat the logic as consistent with history as a principle, and the consistency of logic with history is not an integral part of the dialectics of “capitalism.” The logic of capitalism In line with history, Hegelians distorted Marx’s method. Another view is that “capital theory” thoroughly implement the principle of logic and history. The main body of the study of “capitalism” is capitalist society itself. In Capital, the logic is unconditionally consistent with the history of capitalist society itself. However, with the formation of capitalist society and the history of pre-capitalist society, Somewhere in common, some inconsistencies. There is one on both sides of the debate