被侵权公司为了获得侵权方的证据，投入数十万元，派员工在外租用民房，化名购买侵权方的产品，终于获取了侵权方销售盗版软件的证据。对于本案，北京市第一中级人民法院在审理中认为，原告为了获得被告侵权的证据，投入可观的成本，采取的是“陷阱取证”的方式，但该方式并未 In order to obtain the evidence of the infringer, the infringing company invested hundreds of thousands of yuan to send employees to rented houses and alias names to buy the infringing products, and finally obtained the evidence that the infringing party sold the pirated software. In this case, Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court held in the trial that the plaintiff had invested considerable costs in obtaining the evidence of the defendant’s infringement and adopted the method of “trapping the evidence”, but this method did not