现象形态中确实存在“一分为三”,但仅凭这一点就用“一分为三”补充甚至取代对立统一规律,根据不足。“一分为三”不是矛盾的形式,而是联系的形式。“中介”作为一个重要的哲学范畴,有着普遍的意义,但矛盾中没有独立于对立双方的中介。用“一分为三”、“一分为二”等对辩证法的一些观点作通俗说明是有积极意义的,但必须注意其局限性。 There is indeed “one divides into three” in the phenomenology of the phenomenon, but only by this point we can use “one divides into three” to supplement or even replace the law of unity of opposites, based on the insufficiency. “Divide one into three” is not a contradictory form, but a form of association. As an important philosophical category, “intermediary” has universal meanings, but there is no intermediary in the contradictions that is independent of the two opposing parties. It is of positive significance to make some generalizations of some points of view of dialectics, such as “dividing one into three” and “dividing one into two,” but we must pay attention to its limitations.