论文部分内容阅读
当代社会,刑法的扩张存在着管控风险的现实动因与社会需求,立法上典型的表现就是预备行为和过失危险行为的犯罪化;保护法益尚未遭受现实危险,危险行为已然构成犯罪。面对“网络空间”的解释困境,传统刑法似乎也正在放弃法益保护的理论基底,转而论证“网络空间”作为“公共秩序”载体的可能性。然而,法益保护作为刑法解释的核心概念,不仅具有犯罪说明和犯罪构成的机能,更具有违法性评价和划定犯罪边界的机能。为了更好地保障权利,限制刑罚权的发动,网络犯罪刑法解释的限度仍然是现实的法益侵害或者危险。
In contemporary society, the expansion of criminal law exists the realistic motivation and social demand for the control of risk. The typical performance of legislation is the criminalization of preparatory conduct and dangerous behavior of negligence. The protection of legal interests has not yet been exposed to real danger and the dangerous act has constituted a crime. In the face of the explanation of “cyberspace”, traditional criminal law seems to be abandoning the theoretical basis of legal protection and turning to the possibility of “cyberspace” as the carrier of “public order”. However, as the core concept of criminal law interpretation, the protection of legal interests not only has the function of criminal description and crime constitution, but also has the function of illegitimate evaluation and delimitation of criminal border. In order to better safeguard the rights and limit the launch of the right of punishment, the limit of interpretation of criminal law of cybercrime is still the actual law infringement or danger.