论文部分内容阅读
鉴定是鉴定结论的基础。意欲鉴定结论发挥应有的证明作用,除了对鉴定活动施以必要的程序规范外,还必需对鉴定的实质运作加以干预——即对鉴定佐以质量控制。但是,我国目前有关鉴定制度的改革及完善,忽略了鉴定的质量控制及鉴定方法的标准化问题。此外,本文还分析了现行诉讼制度下,鉴定结论的质证得以落实并最终发挥证明作用的三大要素:鉴定结论的质证主体要素、质证的程序性保障及质证的内容选择。
Identification is the basis for the identification of conclusions. Intended to qualify the conclusions to play its due role, in addition to the necessary procedural norms for the appraisal activities, it is also necessary to intervene in the substantive appraisal - that is, the identification of quality control. However, the current reform and improvement of the appraisal system in our country neglect the standardization of appraisal quality control and appraisal methods. In addition, this article also analyzes the three elements of the evidence-based conclusion of the appraisal conclusion under the current lawsuit system and ultimately to prove the role: the main elements of the authenticating conclusion, the procedural guarantee of the authenticating evidence and the content selection of the authenticating evidence.