所谓私人语言问题,其实也就是语词怎样才具有意义的问题,它与语言的规则是什么这一问题大体相同.当我们谈论某事某物时,我们的语言既不是在意指它,也不是在反映它.不管怎么说,只有在某种约定中,只有存在某种理解意指的方式和理解反映的方式时,意指和反映才能起到指涉的作用.我要指涉什么,为的是有人能理解它.否则的话,就如同对牛弹琴,毫无意义可言.我们的语词要在一定的论述背景中通过它们与正在说或正在做的事物的联系,通过它们对所说的或所做的事物的影响作出指涉.我们说什么以及我 The so-called private language problem, in fact, is the question of how meaningful a language is, and it is roughly the same as the question of what the rules of a language are: when we talk about something, our language neither means it nor is it Reflect it .In any case, only in some agreement, meaning and reflection can play a referential role only if there is some way of understanding and way of understanding. It is someone who understands it, otherwise it is as meaningless as it sounds to a bomber, our words in a certain context of discussion, through which they relate to what is being said or being done, Make a reference to the influence of what we do, what we say, and me