论文部分内容阅读
黑格尔在他的《哲学史讲演录》里,除了勉强承认老子和《易经》有一点哲学思辩外,至于孔子和儒家学派,则被说得一无可取。他说:“孔子只是一个实际的世间智者,在他那里思辩的哲学是一点也没有的——只有一些善良的、老练的、道德的教训,从里面我们不能获得什么特殊的东西。”(黑格尔《哲学史讲演录》第1卷119页)其实在学术繁荣、思想活跃的先秦时期,研究过对象本质自身矛盾的学派,绝非道家一家。本文试图对儒学中的辩证法内容作若干探讨。
In his lectures on Philosophical History, Hegel, apart from reluctantly admitting that Lao Tzu and I Ching learned a little philosophical speculation, Confucius and Confucianism were said to have no choice. He said: “Confucius is only a practical intellectual in the world. There is nothing in his philosophy that he or she can ponder - there are only some good, experienced, and moral lessons from which we can not get anything special.” " (Hegel’s Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Volume 1, p. 119) In fact, during the pre-Qin period of academic prosperity and active thinking, the schools that studied the nature of their own contradictions were by no means the Taoists. This article attempts to discuss the contents of dialectics in Confucianism.