论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较超声、CT和X线诊断肠梗阻的临床价值。方法:选取2015年4月~2016年4月我院收治的240例肠梗阻患者为研究对象,给予超声、CT和X线诊断,分析不同诊断方法的临床价值。结果:本组240例患者,超声与CT检查在梗阻诊断、梗阻部位、梗阻原因及肠狭窄方面的诊断符合率均高于X线检查,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);并且CT检查在梗阻部位、梗阻原因、肠狭窄方面的诊断符合率高于超声检查,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:肠梗阻患者应选取超声或CT检查,二者具有较高的诊断符合率,但由于肠梗阻需要实时动态监测,因此,超声检查的临床价值更为显著,值得推广。
Objective: To compare the clinical value of ultrasound, CT and X-ray diagnosis of intestinal obstruction. Methods: A total of 240 patients with intestinal obstruction admitted to our hospital from April 2015 to April 2016 were enrolled in this study. The diagnostic value of ultrasound, CT and X-ray was analyzed. The clinical value of different diagnostic methods was analyzed. Results: The coincidence rate of ultrasound and CT examination in the diagnosis of obstruction, the location of obstruction, the cause of obstruction and the intestinal stricture were all higher than that of X-ray examination in 240 patients (P <0.05); and the CT examination The coincidence rate of obstruction, obstruction and stenosis was higher than that of ultrasonography (P <0.05). Conclusion: Patients with intestinal obstruction should be selected ultrasound or CT examination, both with high diagnostic accuracy, but due to the need for real-time dynamic monitoring of intestinal obstruction, therefore, the clinical value of ultrasound is more significant and worth promoting.