论文部分内容阅读
目的探究分析血清梅毒抗体检测结果为阳性与临床有关问题。方法于2012年11月—2013年11月期间接受血清梅毒抗体检测的1410例患者,通过两种不同的检验方法加以检测,并且根据患者年龄的不同、性别的不同对比分析其关系。结果不同性别患者采取梅毒血清检测后,检测结果对比不存在差异性,P>0.05不具统计学意义。但对于不同年龄阶段的患者采取梅毒血清检测发现,检测结果有明显差异性,P<0.05有统计学意义。结论因为患者本身原因、检测试剂原因,易导致血清试验存在一定假阳性率,引发临床上的医患纠纷事件。血清梅毒抗体检测结果呈阳性的患者应结合临床综合因素具体分析判断。
Objective To study and analyze the results of serological syphilis antibody test positive and clinical problems. Methods A total of 1410 patients who were tested for syphilis antibody between November 2012 and November 2013 were tested by two different test methods. The relationship was analyzed according to their age and gender. Results There was no significant difference between the two sexes in the detection of syphilis serum, P> 0.05 was not statistically significant. However, for patients of different age groups to take syphilis serum test found that the test results were significantly different, P <0.05 statistically significant. Conclusion Because of the patient’s own reasons, the reason for testing reagents easily lead to a certain false-positive rate of serum test, triggering clinical doctor-patient disputes. Serum syphilis antibody test results were positive patients should be combined with clinical comprehensive analysis of specific factors to determine.