论文部分内容阅读
考虑中的建议许多国家和国家集团提出了解决普遍承认的影响农产品贸易的问题的办法。这些供谈判的建议不仅反映了净出口国和净进口国的不同利益,也反映了对世界农产品贸易应遵守的基本原则的分歧。既然将农产品贸易置于市场力量之下的重要性被普遍承认,分歧便集中在政府对农业部门的干预应当减少并且让市场力量来支配。美国赞同市场导向的观点,提出全部取消农业补贴和进口壁垒。凯恩斯集团也认为要取消一切扭曲性的农业政策。欧共体只提出
Considered proposals Many countries and groups of countries have proposed solutions to the widely recognized problems affecting agricultural trade. These proposals for negotiations not only reflect the different interests of net exporters and net importers, but also reflect differences in the basic principles that should be observed in the world agricultural trade. Since the importance of placing agricultural trade under market forces is widely recognized, disagreements have focused on the government’s intervention in the agricultural sector should be reduced and let market forces dominate. The United States agrees with a market-oriented view and proposes that all agricultural subsidies and import barriers be eliminated. The Keynes Group also believes that all distortionary agricultural policies should be abolished. The European Community only proposes