mpMRI阴性患者诊断有临床意义前列腺癌的危险因素分析与风险分层

来源 :中华泌尿外科杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:llt009
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨前列腺多参数磁共振(mpMRI)阴性患者诊断为有临床意义前列腺癌(CsPCa)的独立危险因素及风险分层方案。方法:回顾性分析2015年10月至2021年1月苏州大学附属第一医院、苏州大学附属第二医院、南京中医药大学附属昆山市中医院收治的前列腺mpMRI检查阴性且行系统穿刺的549例患者的临床资料。患者中位年龄67(62,73)岁,总前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)9.01(6.15,13.64)ng/ml,前列腺体积48.41(35.85,64.28)ml;其中直肠指检阳性54例。549例前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分≤2分,均行12针系统穿刺,其中278例经会阴穿刺,271例经直肠穿刺。以CsPCa为结局指标,对年龄、tPSA、f/tPSA以及PSA密度(PSAD)进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,取最佳截断值,采用logistic回归分析mpMRI阴性患者诊断为CsPCa的独立危险因素。取mpMRI诊断CsPCa的阴性预测值(NPV)为100%时最佳截断值为保护因素,最终提出风险分层方案。结果:549例中前列腺癌79例,其中CsPCa 44例;非前列腺癌470例。CsPCa组与非CsPCa组患者年龄[71 (67,76)岁与67 (61,73)岁]、tPSA[11.95 (8.64,16.26) ng/ml与8.75 (6.06,13.24) ng/ml]、PSAD[0.31 (0.18,0.53) ng/(ml·cmn 3)与0.18 (0.12,0.18) ng/(ml·cmn 3)]、f/tPSA[0.12 (0.09,0.15)与0.16 (0.13,0.22)]、直肠指检阳性率[38.6%(17/44)与7.3%(37/505)]差异有统计学意义(n P65岁(n OR=3.43, 95%n CI 1.55~7.58, n P=0.002)、f/tPSA0.15 ng/(ml·cmn 3)(n OR=3.60, 95%n CI 1.13~11.51, n P=0.030)、直肠指检阳性(n OR=5.20, 95%n CI 2.39~11.32, n P65岁、f/tPSA0.15 ng/(ml·cmn 3)和直肠指检阳性为mpMRI阴性患者诊断为CsPCa的独立危险因素。风险分层为高危组患者推荐行穿刺活检,低危组患者可以考虑避免穿刺。n “,”Objective:To explore independent risk factors and risk stratification for diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (CsPCa) in biopsy-naive patients with nonsuspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI).Methods:The data of 549 patients who underwent initial systematic biopsy (SB) in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Kunshan between October 2015 and January 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Nonsuspicious mpMRI was defined as Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS)≤2. All patients received systematic 12 core prostate biopsy, 278 of them by transperineal and 271 by transrectal biopsies. The median age of the patients was 67 (62, 73) years, the median prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 9.01 (6.15, 13.64) ng/ml, the median prostate volume was 48.41 (35.85, 64.28) ml, and 54 patients were positive in digital rectal examination (DRE). Taking CsPCa as the outcome index, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed on age, tPSA, f/tPSA and PSA density (PSAD) to obtain the optimal cut-off value, and logistics regression was used to explore the independent risk factor of CsPCa in mpMRI negative patients. The optimal cut-off value when the negative predictive value (NPV) of mpMRI diagnosis of CsPCa was 100%, was taken as the protective factor, and the risk stratification model was finally proposed.Results:Of all 549 cases, 44 were CsPCa, 35 were clinically insignificant prostate cancer and 470 were non-prostate cancer. There were significant differences in age (71 vs. 67 years old), tPSA (11.95 vs. 8.75 ng/ml), PSAD [0.31 vs. 0.18 ng/(ml·cmn 3)], f/tPSA (0.12 vs. 0.16) and DRE positive rate (38.6% vs. 7.3%) between CsPCa group and non-CsPCa group (n P<0.01). Cut-off values were taken in ROC analysis when the Youden index was at its maximum. The optimal cut-off values of each continuous variable were: age=65 years, tPSA=10ng/ml, f/tPSA=0.2 and PSAD=0.15 ng/(ml·cmn 3). Multivariate analysis showed that ages over 65 years (n OR=3.43, 95%n CI 1.55-7.58, n P=0.002), f/t PSA ratio0.15 ng/(ml·cmn 3) (n OR=3.60, 95%n CI 1.13-11.51, n P=0.03) and positive DRE (n OR=5.20, 95%n CI 2.39-11.32, n P65 years, f/tPSA 0.15 ng/(ml·cmn 3) and DRE positive are independent risk factors of CsPCa in mpMRI negative patients. Patients in the high-risk group were recommended to undergo prostate biopsy, while patients in the low-risk group could be considered to avoid biopsy.n
其他文献
目的:评价前锯肌平面阻滞-腹直肌后鞘阻滞-全身麻醉用于肝癌切除术的优化效果。方法:择期全麻下行肝癌切除术患者100例,年龄30~64岁,体重指数18~30 kg/mn 2,ASA分级Ⅱ或Ⅲ级,肝功能Child-Pugh分级A或B级,采用随机数字表法分为2组(n n=50):前锯肌平面阻滞联合腹直肌后鞘阻滞组(S组)和胸椎旁神经阻滞组(T组)。S组采用0.375%罗哌卡因在超声引导下行前锯肌平面阻滞(20 ml)联合腹直肌后鞘阻滞(10 ml),T组采用0.375%罗哌卡因在超声引导下行
弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞(QLB)技术是在超声引导下直接将药物注射于外侧弓状韧带上的腰方肌前侧,药物更容易进入低位胸椎旁间隙,避免了传统QLB的许多弊端,为腹部手术的术中和术后镇痛提供了一种更优的选择,在临床麻醉中具有广阔的应用前景。本文对超声引导弓状韧带上QLB的解剖基础和临床应用进行综述。
期刊
目的:评价胸椎旁神经阻滞联合全身麻醉对胸腔镜肺癌根治术老年患者术后脑损伤的影响。方法:择期行胸腔镜下肺癌根治术患者100例,年龄≥65岁,BMI 20~24 kg/mn 2,性别不限,ASA分级Ⅱ或Ⅲ级,采用随机数字表法分为2组(n n=50):全身麻醉组(G组)和胸椎旁神经阻滞联合全身麻醉组(TG组)。TG组在麻醉诱导前行胸椎旁神经阻滞。2组患者均静脉注射咪达唑仑、依托咪酯、罗库溴铵和舒芬太尼进行麻醉诱导,术中靶控输注丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼维持麻醉,间断静脉注射顺式阿曲库铵维持肌松,术毕连
目的:评价低温缺氧复氧时大鼠心肌成纤维细胞(RCF)对H9c2细胞缝隙连接蛋白43(Cx43)表达的影响。方法:体外培养的H9c2细胞,采用随机数字表法分为4组(n n=12):对照组(C组)、低温缺氧复氧组(HHR组)、RCF共培养组(Co组)和RCF共培养+低温缺氧复氧组(Co+HHR组)。C组于37 ℃、5%COn 2+95%空气条件下培养5 h。HHR组于4 ℃、5%COn 2+95%Nn 2条件下培养1 h,然后于37 ℃、5%COn 2+95%
(1)一般情况:患者女性,年龄91岁,身高156 cm,体重50 kg。于1 d前早饭后出现一过性意识丧失,呼之不应,20 min恢复意识,头晕、间断呕吐,头颅CT提示右侧小脑出血;入院当天上午再次呼之不应,浅昏迷状态。复查头颅CT提示小脑血肿较前增大,幕上脑室明显扩张,急诊以“小脑出血”收入院。
期刊
目的:评价驱动压(ΔP)滴定PEEP对机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(RARP)老年患者肺损伤的影响。方法:择期行RARP患者46例,年龄65~80岁,BMI 19~28 kg/mn 2,ASA分级Ⅱ或Ⅲ级,加泰罗尼亚外科患者呼吸风险评估为中高风险,采用随机数字表法分为对照组(C组)和ΔP滴定组(D组)(n n=23)。于麻醉诱导气管插管术后采用容量控制机械通气模式,C组术中采用5 cmHn 2O的固定PEEP;D组分别在机控呼吸后、建立Trendelenburg体位及气腹后滴定最
目的:评价肝缺血再灌注大鼠外泌体对小胶质细胞焦亡的影响。方法:清洁级健康雄性SD大鼠20只,2~3周龄,体重20~50 g,采用随机数字表法分为2组(n n=10):假手术组(S组)和肝缺血再灌注组(I/R组)。取S组及I/R组大鼠血清,使用超速离心法提取外泌体。将PKH26标记的外泌体与小胶质细胞共孵育6 h,采用免疫荧光法检测外泌体的摄取。将原代小胶质细胞以5×10n 5个/ml的密度接种于6孔板,采用随机数字表法分为4组(n n=6):对照组(C组)、10n
目的:评价N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体(NMDA受体)在七氟烷麻醉致老龄小鼠海马神经元程序性坏死中的作用。方法:清洁级健康雄性C57BL/6小鼠90只,18月龄,体重27~30 g,采用随机数字表法分为3组(n n=30):对照组(C组)、七氟烷麻醉组(S组)和七氟烷麻醉+NMDA受体拮抗剂盐酸美金刚组(S+M组)。S组和S+M组小鼠连续3 d吸入3%七氟烷2 h,S+M组于每次吸入七氟烷前1 h腹腔注射盐酸美金刚20 mg/kg,C组只吸入纯氧。分别于麻醉前1 d、麻醉后3和7 d时每组随机取1
2021年新型冠状病毒肺炎(以下简称新冠肺炎)疫情继续肆虐全球,据Worldometer网站实时统计数据,截至2022年1月1日(北京时间06:30),全球累计确诊新冠肺炎288 228 816例,累计死亡达5 451 594例。这场疫情给人们生命安全、身体健康、社会生活和经济造成了巨大的损失和影响。
期刊
目的:评价鸢尾素对呼吸机相关性肺损伤(VILI)大鼠肺泡巨噬细胞极化的影响。方法:SPF级健康成年雄性SD大鼠30只,6~8周龄,体重200~250 g。采用随机数字表法将其分为3组(n n=10):对照组(C组)、VILI组(V组)和鸢尾素组(I组)。采用机械通气(潮气量20 ml/kg,通气频率80次/min,吸入氧浓度21%,吸呼比1∶2,呼气末正压为0)4 h方法制备大鼠VILI模型。C组保留自主呼吸4 h;I组于气管插管前30 min尾静脉注射鸢尾素1 μg/kg,其余组注射等容量生理