论文部分内容阅读
关于我国雕版印刷术起源的时间,近年有几篇文章特始于东汉说。我也是其中的一个。拙文《论雕版印刷术的起源和发展》[1]以考古实物与文献记载相印证的方法,阐述了我的根据与认识。所谓考古实物,是指汉代版印制的画像砖。汉画像砖现已出土数万块,经专家研究,大部分画像砖的制作方法,是用雕刻好的木质印模,在未烧前的砖坯上压印成的[2]。证明雕版复制文字和图像的技法,在汉代已被人们所掌握。所谓文献记载,即指《后汉书·张俭传》所载的“刊章捕俭”。曹之同志写的《“刊章捕俭”辨》[3](以下简称曹文)。提出“刊章”之误。我思之再三,不敢苟同,今谨与曹之同志商榷。一、关于“刊章”乃“邢章”之误问题
About the origin of engraving printing in our country, there are several articles in recent years, especially in Eastern Han Dynasty. I am also one of them. Zhuo Wen “On the origin and development of engraving printing” [1] with archaeological physical and documentary evidence method, expounded on my basis and understanding. The so-called archeology, refers to the Han Dynasty version of the portrait print brick. There are tens of thousands of pieces of Han portrait brick now excavated. After the experts’ study, most of the portrait bricks are made by carving a good wooden impression, which is printed on the brick before it is burnt [2]. The technique of demonstrating that engravings copy words and images has been mastered in the Han Dynasty. The so-called literary record, which refers to “Hou Han Zhang Jian Chuan” contained in the “Journal of Jian thrifty.” Comrade Cao Zhi’s “” Journal of Thrift “identified” [3] (hereinafter referred to as Cao Wen). Proposed “Journal” error. I think again and again, I do not agree, now I would like to discuss with Comrade Cao. First, on the “Journal” is “Xing chapter” of the wrong question