论文部分内容阅读
道义逻辑被认为是“最成问题的”的一个哲学逻辑分支。概因其所研究的规范推理可能涉及不同类型的规范前提,从而需要不同的逻辑模式予以表达:当现实情境符合规范适用条件时所进行的推理(涵摄义务推理)、规范被违反时所进行的推理(渎职义务推理)、存在规范困境时所进行的推理(道义困境推理)、存在例外规范时所进行的推理(例外义务推理)。本文对规范推理的四种基本形式以及如何在规范系统中对其逻辑表达进行了讨论。
The moral logic is considered as a philosophical branch of logic of “the most problematic ”. Because of its normative reasoning may involve different types of normative presuppositions, which need different logic modes to be expressed: when the actual situation in line with the applicable conditions of the norms (culverts reasoning), the norms were violated (Reasoning of dereliction of duty), reasoning in the presence of normative dilemmas (moral predicament reasoning), and reasoning in the case of exceptional norms (exception obligation reasoning). This article discusses the four basic forms of canonical reasoning and how they are expressed in a canonical system.