论文部分内容阅读
刑法中的隐藏漏洞并不同于法外空间和法意模糊,对于刑法中的隐藏漏洞,应当通过目的性限缩的方式进行漏洞补充。通过对目的性限缩论证结构的分析,目的性限缩的运用主要依赖于推论前提本身的正确性,这需要法官对法律所欲保护的法益进行实质权衡和价值判断。目的性限缩作为法官进行法律续造的法律方法,并未违背刑事司法所要求的罪刑法定原则。
The hidden loopholes in the criminal law are not the same as the legal loopholes and the ambiguous meaning of the law. For the hidden loopholes in the criminal law, the loopholes in the loopholes in the criminal law should be supplemented through the purpose of restricting the loopholes. Through the analysis of the structure of the purpose of narrowing the restriction of purpose, the application of the purpose of narrowing depends mainly on the corollary of the corollary premise itself, which requires the judge to the legal protection of legal interests to make a substantive trade-off and value judgments. The purpose of restricting as a judge to carry out the legal method of renewal of the law did not violate the criminal justice required by the statutory principle of crime and punishment.