论文部分内容阅读
在面临千兆位以太网和ATM的选择时,许多公司发现最安全的办法就是两样都选。 1995年,USAA公司的网络已经不能够满足需要,这家保险巨人的IT领导者做出了一个激进的决策:全面重建。他们没有采用扩展令牌环网络以适应带宽需求的计划,而废弃了原有的网络全面重新建立一个。这家公司管理427亿美元的财产,提供汽车、人寿和家庭保险,主要面向美国军人及其家庭,有财力为16500多个工作组选择任何一种高带宽的网络。那么是选择ATM还是千兆位以太网呢?USAA两者都选。象越来越多的面临选择的IT管理人员一样,USAA网络发展
When faced with the choice of Gigabit Ethernet and ATM, many companies find the safest option is both. In 1995, USAA’s network was no longer sufficient. IT giants in this insurance giant made a radical decision to rebuild. They did not adopt the plan of expanding the token ring network to adapt to the bandwidth demand, and discarded the original network to completely re-establish one. The company manages $ 42.7 billion in property and provides automotive, life and home insurance, primarily to U.S. soldiers and their families, with the financial resources to choose any one of a high-bandwidth network for over 16,500 working groups. So choose ATM or Gigabit Ethernet? USAA both choose. Like more and more facing the choice of IT managers, USAA network development