美术界关于如何正确地认识和评价新时期十年中出现的“新潮美术”思潮和运动,发生了尖锐的对立和争论。这场对立的争论的实际意义不能不说是重大的。其重大,不仅仅在于它具有如何实事求是地科学地廓清十年美术历程的艺术史学意义,而且关键在于它具有如何进一步重新明确中国美术发展方向的现实意义和未来意义。其重大,还在于它的影响不仅仅只限于美术界的范围,这场对立争论以其引人 The art circles have sharply opposed and debated how to correctly understand and appraise the “trendy fine arts” trends and movements that emerged during the 10 years of the new era. The actual significance of this controversy can not but be said to be significant. Its significance lies not only in its art history significance of how to scientifically clarify the ten-year art history in a realistic and realistic manner, but also lies in the factual significance and future significance of how to further clarify the direction of the development of Chinese art. Its major, but also because of its influence is not limited to the scope of art, the controversy with its introduction