论文部分内容阅读
最高人民法院、最高人民检察院于2012年12月7日颁布的《关于办理渎职刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释(一)》从司法解释的层面界定了渎职罪的主体范围,一定程度上解决了刑事司法中渎职罪主体认定的难题。然而,人大立法和司法解释层面在此问题上仍存有冲突亟待解决,本文针对我国渎职罪主体的定义分析、涵盖范围、不足之处进行探讨进而提出改良建议,以资司法实践借鉴。
The Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate promulgated the “Interpretation on Several Issues Regarding the Application of Law in Handling Criminal Cases of Malfeasance” (I) promulgated on December 7, 2012, which defines the scope of the crime of dereliction of duty from the perspective of judicial interpretation and resolves to some extent The Problems Confirmed by the Subject of Dereliction of duty in Criminal Justice. However, conflicts still exist on this issue between NPC legislation and judicial interpretation. This article aims at the definition analysis, coverage scope and inadequacies of the main body of the crime of dereliction of duty in our country, and then puts forward suggestions for improvement so as to draw lessons from the judicial practice of capital.