论文部分内容阅读
本文在回溯“新左派”刊物和“文化研究”相互关联的历史性渊源的基础上,指出没有20世纪50、60年代创办于英国牛津大学的《大学与左派评论》、《新理性者》和两刊合并后于伦敦出版的《新左派评论》等“新左派”刊物,就没有“文化研究”的诞生。“文化研究”作为一种与传统学科迥异的全新理论,其自身的政治性、跨学科性、边缘性等内涵和指向,在某种意义上源自于“新左派”刊物的时代风格和理论诉求。而战后英国的独立知识分子,如威廉斯、霍家特、霍尔、汤普森、安德森等人,作为“新左派”刊物的创办人和编辑,共同开启了这一新的学科并使之不断走向成熟。
On the basis of reviewing the historical origins of the interrelated “New Left” publications and “Cultural Studies”, this paper points out that there is no “University and Left Review” founded in Oxford University in the 1950s and 1960s, Rationalist, “and” new leftist “publications such as the” New Left Review “published in London after the integration of the two publications, there is no such thing as” cultural studies. “ As a completely different new theory from traditional disciplines, ”cultural studies“ has its own connotation and point of politics, interdisciplinarity and fringe, which in some sense originated from the publication of ”New Left“ Contemporary style and theoretical demands. After the war, British independent intellectuals such as Williams, 霍霍特, Hall, Thompson, Anderson and others, as the founder and editor of the magazine ”New Left," jointly opened up this new discipline and made The constant maturity.