论文部分内容阅读
绿蓝悖论是当代逻辑哲学、科学哲学、形式知识论等领域研究工作的核心之一。对绿蓝悖论源发语境的考察,明确了绿蓝悖论是确证悖论的殊型。为了解决绿蓝悖论,哲学家们在语言论、科学方法论和贝耶斯主义等路径上提出了诸多方案。辨析这些代表性方案表明,它们都不能令人满意地解决绿蓝悖论。造成这种局面的深层原因是确证理论的逻辑研究范式,良好的解悖方案可能要在认知路径上寻求。
Green-blue paradox is one of the core of contemporary logical philosophy, philosophy of science, formal epistemology and other fields. The investigation of the source context of green-blue paradox makes it clear that the green-blue paradox is a special type of corroboration paradox. In order to solve the green-blue paradox, philosophers put forward many proposals on the path of linguistics, scientific methodology and Bayesianism. Discrimination of these representative schemes shows that none of them can satisfactorily solve the green-blue paradox. The underlying reason for this situation is the logical paradigm of the corroboration theory, and a good solution to the anti-paradox may be sought on the cognitive path.